Case 2413663/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Wood v Mrs S P Markey and Mr P W Markey t/a Flair Hairdressing Salon — 2019
- Case reference
- 2413663/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Vincent Ryan
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Ms H D Price, Mrs J E Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Wood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal accepted, on the respondent's concession, that Ms Wood was a disabled person by reason of varicose veins and cardiac arrhythmia. It upheld her complaint under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 that she had not been given itemised pay statements, and it also declared that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of initial employment particulars under section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. The section 8 award was left to a remedy hearing, while no award was made on the section 1 declaration because of section 38 and schedule 5 Employment Act 2002.
The remaining claims were dismissed. The tribunal rejected the automatic unfair dismissal claim, finding that Ms Wood was dismissed on 20 May 2018 for a reason related to conduct rather than for asserting a statutory right. It also dismissed the section 15 Equality Act 2010 disability claim, which alleged unfavourable treatment by dismissal and by dismissal without following fair procedure in accordance with good industrial relations practice, together with the claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements contrary to section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996; the award was to be confirmed at a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim for asserting a statutory right; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed on 20 May 2018 for a reason related to conduct. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim based on dismissal and dismissal without following fair procedure in accordance with good industrial relations practice. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Declaration that the respondent failed to provide a statement of initial employment particulars under section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996; no award was payable because of section 38 and schedule 5 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.