Case 2413668/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Shepherd v Shuttleworth College and 4 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413668/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Dated
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mr N Shepherd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings against Lancashire County Council were dismissed after the claimant withdrew each of the claims made against that respondent. No substantive liability findings were made in relation to those claims in this judgment.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claim for ordinary (constructive) unfair dismissal against the remaining respondents was dismissed after the claimant withdrew that claim. The judgment expressly stated that this did not affect the claimant's automatic unfair dismissal claims, which were to continue.
The remaining claims were listed to proceed to a hearing on 19 April 2021 to 26 April 2021. This judgment did not determine remedy, because it dealt only with the withdrawal and procedural dismissal of claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as the claimant's 'ordinary (constructive) unfair dismissal' claim. It was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it; the judgment states that automatic unfair dismissal claims were not affected and were continuing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.