Case 2413671/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Pitts v Sentrex Services UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413671/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Pitts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 March 2021, the tribunal told the claimant that it was not clear what complaint he was bringing and ordered him to identify the claim or claims within the tribunal's jurisdiction and the dates of the events relied on. The claimant did not comply with that order.
The case was listed for a preliminary hearing by video on 5 July 2021. The claimant did not join the hearing by the time it started, and the Employment Judge waited until 10.15am without any attendance or explanation from him.
In the absence of any identified claim and given the claimant's failure to comply with the order or attend the hearing, the tribunal concluded that the claim was not being actively pursued. The claim was therefore struck out. No merits findings or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not identify a specific jurisdictional claim. It struck out the claim because the claimant failed to comply with the order of 18 March 2021 requiring him to identify the claims and dates, and he did not attend the preliminary hearing on 5 July 2021 or provide any explanation. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.