Case 2413704/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Jackson v Sunshine Care Rochdale CIC — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413704/2019
- Decision date
- 8 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Jackson's claim against Sunshine Care Rochdale CIC was heard by Employment Judge McDonald sitting alone at Manchester by CVP on 1 December 2020. The claimant was not in attendance; the respondent was represented by Mr C Peel, Consultant.
The Tribunal's judgment was that the claim was struck out pursuant to rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The written record does not set out the underlying factual allegations or the specific legal basis of the claim, and it gives no monetary award.
The judgment records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it states only that 'this claim' was struck out under rule 37. The gov.uk listing for the case is categorised as Disability Discrimination, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.