Case 2413721/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Sabar v SER Staffing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413721/2019
- Decision date
- 27 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Sabar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester Employment Tribunal hearing on 12-14 October 2020 before Employment Judge Dunlop, Mr N Sabar succeeded in his unfair dismissal claim against SER Staffing Ltd. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £1,442.28 and made no compensatory award.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's direct discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010, which was pleaded on grounds of race and/or religion or belief. It also dismissed the victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010 on the same stated grounds.
The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages/breach of contract relating to commission payments succeeded in part. The tribunal ordered SER Staffing Ltd to pay £550 gross, so the principal monetary awards recorded in the judgment totalled £1,992.28 before any interest considerations.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered a basic award of £1,442.28 and made no compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £1,442 |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the direct discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010. The judgment described the allegation as being on grounds of race and/or religion or belief. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal dismissed the victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010. The judgment described it as being on grounds of race and/or religion or belief. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages/breach of contract concerning commission payments succeeded in part. The tribunal ordered payment of £550 gross. | Upheld | — | £550 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,992
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,442
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.