Case 2413726/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M J B Sykes Mr A N Bailey Ms M Hughes Mrs D Ogden Miss N Gallimore Ms L Lockett-Powell v Lloyds Evans Prichard Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413726/2019
- Decision date
- 31 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M J B Sykes Mr A N Bailey Ms M Hughes Mrs D Ogden Miss N Gallimore Ms L Lockett-Powell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment covering case numbers 2413726/2019 to 2413731/2019, heard at Manchester on 20 January 2020 before Employment Judge Sherratt. The only substantive recorded step is that the judge read emails from the claimants.
Following those emails, the tribunal recorded that all of the claimants' claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No findings were made on the merits of any complaint, and the judgment does not set out reasons beyond the fact of withdrawal.
No monetary award was made or recorded in the judgment. The decision was sent to the parties on 31 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that, upon reading emails from the claimants, all of the claimants' claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The specific underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing/categories rather than restated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that, upon reading emails from the claimants, all of the claimants' claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The specific underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing/categories rather than restated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that, upon reading emails from the claimants, all of the claimants' claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The specific underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing/categories rather than restated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.