Case 2413733/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S.L. Merrin v Maryport Health Services — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413733/2023
- Decision date
- 6 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. S.L. Merrin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 2 September 2024 before Judge Callan, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its practice manager. The tribunal's written judgment records that the claimant's claim of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted payments in respect of training leave, outstanding sick pay and holiday pay. It recorded that payment of the sum owed in respect of training leave had been made to the claimant on 25 July 2024, so that issue was no longer outstanding at the time of judgment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the remaining sum owed to the claimant, £930.85 gross, net of tax and national insurance within 28 days of the date of judgment. The written record also includes the Tribunal Interest Order notice, which states the relevant decision day was 5 September 2024 and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum, but no separate interest figure was stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claimant's unauthorised deductions from wages claim well-founded. It found unlawful deductions in respect of training leave, outstanding sick pay and holiday pay. Payment of the sum owed for training leave had been made on 25 July 2024, leaving £930.85 gross outstanding. | Upheld | — | £931 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £931
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.