Case 2413744/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Smith v Cliffemount Community Care Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2413744/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr Smith's claim of unfair dismissal because of protected disclosures under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996. It also upheld his claim for unlawful deductions from wages, finding that deductions had been shown on the payslips as tax and national insurance payments to the relevant authorities, but were not in fact paid over as described.
The tribunal further upheld a breach of contract claim for unpaid notice of termination of employment. It also upheld the statutory claim concerning the failure to provide an updated statement of employment particulars and compliant itemised payslips under ss.1, 4 and 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. In relation to the payslip issue, it made a declaration that the respondent's payslips did not comply with s.8 because the deductions for tax and national insurance were wrongly itemised.
The respondent was ordered to pay £14,429.09 in total. The award was broken down as £3,929.98 for breach of contract (notice pay), £1,013.03 as the compensatory award for unfair dismissal, £7,178.40 for unlawful deductions from wages, and £2,307.68 for failure to provide an updated statement of written employment particulars. The recoupment provisions did not apply. The judgment also included an interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no separate interest figure was stated in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a claim of unfair dismissal because of making protected disclosures, pursuant to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,013 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deductions claim concerned deductions wrongly identified on payslips as payments to the relevant authorities for tax and national insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £7,178 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was for unpaid notice of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £3,930 |
| Other | The judgment upheld the claim for failure to provide an updated statement of employment particulars and itemised payslips under ss.1, 4 and 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,429
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,013
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- ss.1, 4 & 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.