Case 2413752/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Gibson v Fuse Assurance Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413752/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Gibson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal allowed the claimant to amend her claim to add a breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay. It then found in the claimant's favour on all pleaded heads of claim: the respondent had made an unlawful deduction of wages by failing to pay her for 11 days between 1 and 19 August 2019, had failed to pay 6.5 days' holiday pay entitlement on termination under the Working Time Regulations, and had failed to pay one week's contractual notice pay.
The tribunal awarded £1,692.07 net for the unpaid wages claim, £999.85 net for the holiday pay claim, and £769.12 net for the breach of contract claim, giving a total award of £3,461.04. The written record also contained the standard Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 notice, recording 28 January 2020 as the relevant decision day, 29 January 2020 as the calculation day, and an 8% stipulated rate of interest if sums were not paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Failure to pay the claimant for 11 days between 1 and 19 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay 6.5 days' holiday pay entitlement on termination under the Working Time Regulations. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal allowed amendment to add a claim for one week's contractual notice pay. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,461
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.