Case 2413754/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Hindley v RS Catering Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413754/2019
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Hindley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. In Miss A Hindley v RS Catering Solutions Ltd, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £445.86 gross, assessed on the claimant’s gross pay for the notice period.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £504.31 gross. The judgment records that the hearing originally listed for 9 March 2020 would not be re-listed.
The decision notes that damages for breach of contract were assessed on the basis of gross pay for the notice period and that, once paid, HMRC is likely to require tax and national insurance to be paid on that amount as Post-Employment Notice Pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £445.86 gross, assessed on the claimant’s gross pay for the notice period. | Upheld | — | £446 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £504.31 gross. | Upheld | — | £504 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £950
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.