Case 2413807/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Morrish v Cumbria Rural Academy — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413807/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Representation
- Venue
- Carlisle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Morrish
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Morrish brought complaints against Cumbria Rural Academy about unauthorised deductions from wages and other payments said to be due to her. Employment Judge Nicol heard the case at Carlisle on 17 December 2019 and gave judgment orally at the hearing.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint that the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from her wages, and also dismissed the broader complaint that, save for one matter, she did not receive other payments to which she was entitled from the respondent. Those complaints were held not to be well founded.
The tribunal upheld the separate complaint that the claimant did not receive all of the holiday pay due to her on termination of employment. It ordered Cumbria Rural Academy to pay £196.80 in respect of that holiday pay, with the claimant responsible for accounting to HMRC for any income tax and/or National Insurance Contributions due. The written record states that the respondent's correct name is Cumbria Rural Academy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, and that she did not receive other payments to which she was entitled from the respondent save as mentioned below, were not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claimant did not receive all holiday pay due to her on termination of employment and ordered payment of £196.80, subject to any tax and National Insurance deductions due. | Upheld | — | £197 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £197
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.