Case 2413900/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Allen v Elle R Leisure — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413900/2019
- Decision date
- 3 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 24 January 2020 before Employment Judge Phil Allen sitting alone. The claimant, Mr B Allen, appeared in person and the respondent, Elle R Leisure Ltd, was represented by Mrs Y Moghimi, HR Manager.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal held that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. No monetary award was made.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written record sent to the parties on 3 February 2020 records only the dismissal of the claim and does not set out further findings of fact or a damages calculation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.