Case 2413901/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A M O’Doherty v Bolton Textiles (Group) Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2413901/2020
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A M O’Doherty
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A M O’Doherty’s claims in case numbers 2413901/2020 and 2401621/2021 were listed against Bolton Textiles (Group) Limited. Employment Judge Anderson sat alone at Manchester via CVP on 14 November 2022. The respondent had entered compulsory liquidation, and the tribunal therefore stayed the claims until 15 May 2023. The judgment also amended the respondent’s title to Bolton Textiles (Group) Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) and amended its address to that of the Official Receiver of Manchester.
The judgment did not decide the underlying unfair dismissal and wages issues on the merits. It stated that if no application to lift the stay was received by 15 May 2023, all claims would be dismissed without further order. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment did not determine the merits of the claim. It stayed the proceedings to 15 May 2023 because the respondent had entered compulsory liquidation. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment did not determine the merits of the claim. It stayed the proceedings to 15 May 2023 because the respondent had entered compulsory liquidation. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.