Case 2413917/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Allen & others v John Sutch Cranes Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2413917/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Rawlinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Allen & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal via CVP on 4, 5 and 6 January 2022 before Employment Judge M Rawlinson sitting alone. The claimants were Mr A Allen and others, and the respondent was John Sutch Cranes Limited.
The tribunal's judgment was that the claimants' claims for unauthorised deductions from wages were not well founded. Those claims were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment extract provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimants' claims for unauthorised deductions from wages were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.