Case 2413926/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Ahmad v Jussin 3 Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413926/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Ahmad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 9 January 2020 before Employment Judge Franey sitting alone. The claimant, Mr B Ahmad, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Jussin 3 Limited, was represented by Mr J Ahmed, described in the judgment as proprietor.
The judgment states that the claim was dismissed. In the reasons, the tribunal said the dismissal was because the claimant failed to attend the hearing or be represented at it, and therefore the claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
No substantive findings on the merits of any underlying employment claim are recorded in the judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s) in the reasons. The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing or be represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.