Case 2413927/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Baron v Capita Business Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413927/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Baron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Field Monitoring Officer and was dismissed for gross misconduct after the respondent concluded that she had recorded false information in visit reports, misled management about calls to two subjects in Barrow, and failed properly to communicate with another subject who required a translator. The claimant argued that the real reason for the investigation and dismissal was her repeated request for a company van, and raised procedural concerns about the disciplinary process.
The Tribunal found no evidence beyond the claimant's assertions that her request for a van played any part in the decision to dismiss. It accepted that the respondent had a genuine belief in the misconduct, that the belief was based on reasonable grounds, and that the investigation, disciplinary hearing and appeal were within the range of reasonable responses. The Tribunal also found that comparator situations relied on by the claimant were materially different and did not make the dismissal unfair.
On the wages claim, the claimant argued that she should have received company sick pay rather than SSP while self-isolating due to Covid-19. The Tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that its Covid-19 pay position at the time was that employees who could not work from home and had to self-isolate were entitled to SSP only, and found that the claimant had not shown entitlement to additional company sick pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the respondent established misconduct as the reason for dismissal, held a genuine belief on reasonable grounds after a reasonable investigation, followed a fair and reasonable procedure, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned the claimant being paid SSP rather than company sick pay during Covid-19 self-isolation. The Tribunal found the claimant had not established entitlement to more than SSP. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- range of reasonable responses
- Paul v East Surrey District Health Authority [1995] IRLR 305 CA
- Hadjioannou v Coral Casinos Limited [1981] IRLR 352 EAT
- Securicor Limited v Smith [1989] CA
- Statutory Sick Pay (General) Regulations 1982
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.