Case 2413929/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Gupta v Moda Fashions (Shrewsbury) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413929/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Gupta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Gupta brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against Moda Fashions (Shrewsbury) Limited. Employment Judge Ainscough, sitting alone at Manchester on 16 December 2019, recorded that the claimant had worked as a store manager from 11 June 2019 to 27 July 2019, had daily rates of £84.62 up to 9 July 2019 and £88.46 from 9 July 2019, and was entitled to one week’s notice and 28 days’ holiday.
The tribunal upheld the claim. It awarded £761.58 gross for unpaid wages from 30 June 2019 to 8 July 2019, £1,061.52 gross for unpaid wages from 9 July 2019 to 27 July 2019, £442.30 gross for the notice period, and £353.84 gross for accrued holiday pay up to 3 August 2019, making £2,619.24 gross in total. The tribunal then deducted £745 already received on termination, leaving £1,874.24 gross payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had worked as a store manager from 11 June 2019 to 27 July 2019, was paid at daily rates of £84.62 up to 9 July 2019 and £88.46 from 9 July 2019, and was entitled to one week’s notice and 28 days’ holiday. It awarded £761.58 gross for unpaid wages for 30 June 2019 to 8 July 2019, £1,061.52 gross for unpaid wages for 9 July 2019 to 27 July 2019, £442.30 gross for five days’ notice pay, and £353.84 gross for accrued holiday pay, giving a gross total of £2,619.24. After crediting £745 received on termination, the amount payable was £1,874.24 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,874 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,874
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.