Case 2413937/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Akhtar v New Focus Health Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413937/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt. The
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Akhtar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a paper judgment in a claim presented on 19 October 2019 for unlawful deductions from pay. The respondent filed a late response admitting that the claimant was owed £342.50 as pay for work done, and the tribunal recorded that the admitted amount had since been paid. By consent, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £342.50 unlawfully deducted from her pay, save insofar as that sum had already been paid.
The claimant also sought £360 for taxi fares incurred for travel to work on six occasions in August and September 2019 after an accident meant she could not drive. The tribunal held that these expense claims were not included on the original claim form and that no permission had been granted to amend the claim to add a breach of contract complaint.
The tribunal further considered section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996, which allows compensation for financial loss attributable to an unlawful deduction, but declined to make any award for the taxi fares. It found that the fares were not attributable to the unlawful deduction itself, but to the claimant's efforts to resolve the matter and to her inability to drive because of her accident. The taxi fare claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £342.50 unlawfully deducted from the claimant's pay, save insofar as that sum had already been paid; the respondent had admitted owing that amount as pay for work done. | Upheld | — | £343 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for £360 taxi fares for travel to work on six occasions in August and September 2019 was dismissed. The tribunal noted that no permission had been granted to amend the claim to introduce a breach of contract complaint, and held the expenses were not attributable to the unlawful deduction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £343
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.