Case 2413939/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Crowley v Rileys Sports Bar (2014) Limited (in Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413939/2020
- Decision date
- 25 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Crowley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Crowley brought a claim against Rileys Sports Bar (2014) Limited (in Administration) before Employment Judge Robinson sitting alone at Manchester on 17 June 2021. The tribunal identified the claim as one for a protective award. It noted that the respondent had been in administration for some time and that the company had made the claimant redundant.
The tribunal held that permission from the administrators related only to a protective award, so no other claim could be dealt with in the proceedings. It also recorded that the claimant had already received, from the Government's redundancy service, a redundancy payment, holiday pay and notice pay.
On the protective award claim, the tribunal found that fewer than 20 employees were working at the establishment where the claimant was a General Manager. It concluded that there was no jurisdiction to allow a protective award in those circumstances and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim. The tribunal recorded that permission from the administrators related only to a protective award, and held that there was no jurisdiction to allow a protective award because fewer than 20 employees worked at the establishment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.