Case 2413942/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Zarzycki v Mr J Ambrozy and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413942/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten MEMBERS
- Panel members
- Ms PJ Byrne, Ms P Owen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Zarzycki
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 27 and 28 October 2020, the tribunal heard Mr N Zarzycki's claims against Mr J Ambrozy and IBB Builders Merchants Ltd. The unanimous judgment recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded, and the first respondent was ordered to pay £2,362.50, identified in the judgment as a basic award for unfair dismissal.
The tribunal also found that the claimant suffered unlawful discrimination because of something arising in consequence of his disability. The first respondent was ordered to pay £5,000 for injury to feelings. The written record does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons, but it does record the liability finding and the remedy.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The attached interest notice states that the stipulated rate of interest was 8%, but the judgment itself does not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The first respondent was ordered to pay £2,362.50, described as compensation comprising a basic award for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £2,363 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found unlawful discrimination because of something arising in consequence of the claimant's disability and awarded £5,000 for injury to feelings. | Upheld | Disability | £5,000 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,363
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,363
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.