Case 2413942/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Dragusanu v Wadsworth Care Homes Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413942/2020
- Decision date
- 29 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cronshaw
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Dragusanu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cronshaw, sitting alone in Manchester on 20 October 2021, found that Wadsworth Care Homes Ltd was in breach of contract because it had not reimbursed Mrs D Dragusanu for items she bought for the care home in the course of her employment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay net damages of £1,140.46.
The separate unlawful deduction from wages claim, described in the judgment as relating to pension, was dismissed on withdrawal. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so no further substantive analysis of that claim appears in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to reimburse the claimant for items she had purchased for the care home in the course of her employment. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records the unlawful deduction from wages claim relating to pension as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,140
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.