Case 2413958/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Rabasauskaite v Lanisan Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413958/2019
- Decision date
- 14 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Rabasauskaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment where the respondent did not present a response, and the tribunal proceeded on the information before the judge. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It recorded the deduction as £433.20 after credit was given for a payment of £600.00, and ordered the respondent to pay that gross sum to the claimant.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £216.48 for that head of claim.
In addition, the tribunal made an award pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the sum of £656.00, described in the judgment as two week's pay. The hearing listed for 21 April 2020 was cancelled. The judgment does not set out any separate interest calculation or wider reasons beyond the Rule 21 basis for disposal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages of £433.20 after giving credit for a payment of £600.00. | Upheld | — | £433 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £216 |
| Other | Award made pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the sum of £656.00, described as two week's pay. | Upheld | — | £656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,306
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.