Case 2413975/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs D Guttentag (2) Mr RJ Guttentag (3) Mrs A Muller (4) Mr J Miller v Whitefield Hebrew Congregation and 3 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413975/2019
- Decision date
- 18 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
5 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs D Guttentag (2) Mr RJ Guttentag (3) Mrs A Muller (4) Mr J Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is a short procedural decision. It records that the complaints against the fourth respondent, Mr Richard Kay, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimants. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the extracted text for that respondent.
The judgment also states that the claims against the first, second and third respondents, Whitefield Hebrew Congregation, Mr David Krebs and Mr Michael Moore, continued. The extract does not identify the underlying claim types, any legal tests applied, or any monetary award. It is dated 9 August 2020 and was sent to the parties on 18 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the complaints against the fourth respondent, Mr Richard Kay, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimants. No substantive merits findings are given in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.