Case 2413981/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Whalley v Perspex Distribution Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413981/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Whalley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shotter, sitting alone at Liverpool by remote CVP hearing, found that Mr R Whalley was unfairly dismissed by Perspex Distribution Ltd. The judgment states that his unfair dismissal claim was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered compensation totalling £9,656.54. This comprised a basic award of £8,056.54, loss of statutory rights of £500, and loss of earnings for two weeks of £1,100 net. The judgment does not set out any separate findings on additional claims or any separate interest calculation within the award itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered compensation of £9,656.54. The award was said to consist of a basic award of £8,056.54, loss of statutory rights of £500, and loss of earnings for two weeks of £1,100 net. | Upheld | — | £9,657 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,657
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,057
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,600
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.