Case 2414050/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Edwards v Veron Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414050/2021
- Decision date
- 12 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and the respondent had not presented a valid response within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes entered judgment without a contested hearing.
The sole substantive finding recorded in the judgment was that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal therefore upheld that claim and ordered Veron Group Limited to pay Mr J Edwards the gross sum of £1,214.40.
The judgment also included the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It recorded that the relevant decision day was 11 April 2022, the calculation day was 12 April 2022, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8%, but no separate interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a valid response within the prescribed time limit. | Upheld | — | £1,214 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,214
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.