Case 2414077/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Thompson v Board 24 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414077/2021
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gianferrari REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Thompson worked for Board 24 Ltd for 25 years, most recently as a fork lift truck driver. He went off sick on 6 July 2020 and did not return before his dismissal on 22 June 2021. The tribunal accepted that he had previously had a very good sickness record and that the respondent had also investigated his earlier grievance allegations of bullying and harassment, finding no evidence to support them.
The unfair dismissal claim was brought on capability grounds. The tribunal recorded that the respondent engaged with the claimant throughout the absence process, held absence meetings, asked for information about his sickness and medication, sought permission to contact his GP, and referred him to Occupational Health and the company’s employment assessment scheme. The claimant did not provide sufficient medical information, refused Occupational Health, and at the capability meeting on 11 June 2021 said he was not fit to return to work and did not know when he might be able to return.
Applying section 98 ERA 1996 and the case law it cited on ill-health dismissal, including Iceland Frozen Foods, Spencer, Daubney, BS v Dundee City Council and McCadie, the tribunal found that the respondent genuinely believed the claimant was no longer capable of performing his duties. It found that the respondent had adequately consulted him and had carried out a reasonable investigation into his up-to-date medical position.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had waited a sufficient period before dismissal, given that the claimant had been absent for nearly 50 weeks and had not provided the information needed to assess a safe return to work. It held that dismissal for capability fell within the range of reasonable responses. The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed for capability/ill health under section 98 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Spencer v Paragon Wallpapers Ltd
- East Lindsey District Council v Daubney
- BS v Dundee City Council
- McCadie v Royal Bank of Scotland
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.