Case 2414084/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Maudsley v Late Rooms Limited (in Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2414084/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Maudsley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Late Rooms Limited (in Administration), did not present a valid response, so the tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment. It found that the respondent failed to consult with the claimant as a person who may be affected by proposals to dismiss, or measures taken in connection with the dismissal of, 20 or more employees, in breach of s.188(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found a breach of s.188(1) TULRCA 1992 and held that the claimant was entitled to a protective award, but no financial amount was quantified at this stage. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment says the claimant's other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by him in his email of 19 March 2020, but it does not identify those claims individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188(1) TULRCA 1992
- s.192 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.