Case 2414087/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z McGonigle v Paul Nesbitt — 2019
- Case reference
- 2414087/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z McGonigle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Regional Employment Judge Parkin on 24 December 2019 in the case of Ms Z McGonigle v Paul Nesbitt. The respondent did not present a response, and the tribunal proceeded on the information before the judge.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £750 gross, described in the judgment as 6 days at £125 per day.
The notice attached to the judgment stated that the hearing listed for 9 January 2020 was cancelled. The accompanying interest notice recorded the relevant decision day as 31 December 2019, the calculation day as 1 January 2020, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%, but no separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £750 gross, stated as 6 days at £125 per day. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.