Case 2414111/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bradley v DXCG Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414111/2019
- Decision date
- 31 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that DXCG Ltd made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Bradley's wages and ordered £4,687.50, found that he was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,844.64, found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,362.50, and found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £1,875.00. The total monetary award across those sums is £11,769.64.
The tribunal also held that Mr Bradley was unfairly dismissed, but it made no award of compensation for the unfair dismissal claim. The attached interest notice recorded 31 January 2020 as the relevant decision day, 1 February 2020 as the calculation day, and an 8% stipulated rate for sums unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £4,687.50 gross/net. | Upheld | — | £4,688 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards £2,844.64 damages. | Upheld | — | £2,845 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,362.50. | Upheld | — | £2,363 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,875.00. | Upheld | — | £1,875 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed but made no compensation award for that claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,770
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.