Case 2414122/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Thoburn v Estates and Law Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2414122/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Thoburn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a procedural judgment, not a merits determination of the underlying employment claims. By an order sent on 8 July 2024, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order requiring exchange of witness statements by 17 May 2024.
The respondent did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment also records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but may participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the respondent's response for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order for exchange of witness statements by 17 May 2024. It does not determine the underlying substantive claims in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.