Case 2414123/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Stachurska v Alterations Centre Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2414123/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Stachurska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, in a Rule 21 judgment, found for the claimant on four separate heads of claim against Alterations Centre Ltd. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,140 for an unauthorised deduction from wages, £740 for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, £1,665 as a redundancy payment, and £320 for holiday entitlement that had not been paid.
The judgment records each remedy as a distinct sum and does not set out any further reasons, hearing findings, or apportionment beyond the statutory labels used in the orders. The total of the sums awarded is £3,865.
The attached notice on interest explains the tribunal’s standard interest arrangements and records the relevant decision day as 15 March 2021 and the calculation day as 16 March 2021, but the judgment itself does not state any separate interest award or any other additional monetary component.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £740 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,665 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,865
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.