Case 2414136/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Stefania La Croce v Il Vecchio Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2414136/2020
- Decision date
- 18 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newstead Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Stefania La Croce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was employed by Il Vecchio Ltd from September or October 2017 until 7 July 2020, when she told Mr Brahimi she had decided to leave. The tribunal rejected the respondent’s case that her employment ended on 3 June 2020. It relied on the absence of any contemporaneous dismissal communication, the respondent’s request on 4 July 2020 that she work that night, the respondent’s conduct on 7 July and 14 July 2020, and the fact that the claimant only first learned of a 3 June leaving date from a P45 sent on 17 July 2020.
On furlough, the tribunal found that the claimant orally agreed after 22 March 2020 to be placed on furlough, but did not agree any reduced percentage. It found that she was not actually put on furlough until around the beginning of April 2020 and that from 10 April 2020 she was paid 85% of her pre-furlough wage. The tribunal accepted the Government Gateway records showing gross taxable income of £3,213.24 to 3 July 2020, and then added four further days to 7 July 2020, giving gross pay properly payable of £3,332.82 for the relevant period.
The tribunal rejected the respondent’s suggestion that the claimant had been paid by a takeaway while on furlough. It found there was no evidence that she was paid by the takeaway, and that she was contractually entitled to take additional third-party work in any event. It also found that the respondent did not authorise any deductions from wages, and that the sums actually received by the claimant were £1,720 net.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and calculating the gross equivalent of the net sums actually paid, the tribunal held that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £1,559.62. It ordered the respondent to pay that amount to the claimant. The judgment also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant confirmed at the hearing that she was not pursuing unfair dismissal; the sole issue was unauthorised deductions from wages for the period March to July 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,560
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.