Case 2414138/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Johnston v Plus Dane Housing Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414138/2021
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Liverpool on 2-6 October and 9-10 October 2023 before Employment Judge Barker, with Mr Johnston appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The written judgment records the outcome only and states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal found that Mr Johnston was not dismissed. His unfair dismissal claim therefore failed and was dismissed. No written reasons are provided in the public record beyond that conclusion.
The respondent's counterclaim succeeded, and the claimant was ordered to pay Plus Dane Housing Limited £2,837.10. The written judgment does not identify the legal basis of the counterclaim in the extracted text, so the record only captures the monetary outcome.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim succeeded, but the written record does not identify the legal basis of the counterclaim. | Upheld | — | £2,837 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,837
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.