Case 2414142/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Redman v Coffee United (Bootle 1 Ltd) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414142/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Redman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss A Redman, was employed from May 2019 until 31 July 2020, when her employment ended by redundancy. The tribunal found that she had taken the holiday she had accrued up to the end of December 2019 and had no holiday carried forward into 2020. It accepted her evidence that she took no holiday between January and July 2020, and that she had been on maternity leave from the end of January, although she could not recall the exact date.
On the holiday calculation, the tribunal accepted that the claimant accrued 1.66 days per month and therefore built up 11.62 days by the termination date. She had been paid for the equivalent of six days on termination, leaving 5.62 days outstanding. Using a daily rate of £60, the tribunal calculated the unpaid holiday balance at £337.20 and made an award for accrued but untaken holiday pay.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant had received a contract or statement of main particulars of employment, so it was not appropriate to make any award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The judgment text contains an internal inconsistency, because paragraph 4 refers to £327.20 while the main judgment and the calculation in paragraph 2 support £337.20; the award is recorded here on the basis of the latter figures.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The written judgment states £337.20 in the dispositive order and in the calculation at paragraph 2, but paragraph 4 refers to £327.20. The award is recorded here on the basis of the calculated figure and the main judgment line. | Upheld | — | £337 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £337
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.