Case 2414143/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Walsh v Dip This Hydrographics Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414143/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Walsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by video on 30 November 2020 before Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone. The claimant, Mrs J Walsh, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the hearing was a remote hearing by video conference call to which the parties entitled to attend had consented.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claims of breach of contract as it related to notice and unlawful deductions from wages were all well founded and succeeded. No separate liability reasoning is set out beyond that conclusion in the short judgment.
The tribunal awarded £772.20 for one month’s gross notice pay, calculated as one twelfth of an annual salary of £9,266.40, taking into account the increase to the National Minimum Wage from April 2020. It also awarded £880.80 for five weeks’ gross unpaid wages, described as one week at £168 and four weeks at £178.20, again reflecting the April 2020 National Minimum Wage increase.
A further £122.40 was awarded for a 12-week gross shortfall in pay of £10.20 per week following the April 2020 National Minimum Wage increase. The order was sent to the parties on 3 December 2020, and the attached interest notice states that sums payable under the judgment may carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if unpaid after the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay award of £772.20, described as one month's gross notice pay. | Upheld | — | £772 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded £880.80 for five weeks' gross unpaid wages and £122.40 for a 12-week gross shortfall in pay; these sums were awarded within the unlawful deductions from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £1,003 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,775
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.