Case 2414153/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Keeler v R&S Enterprise (UK) Private Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414153/2021
- Decision date
- 16 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Keeler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. Employment Judge Phil Allen recorded that the respondent, R&S Enterprise (UK) Private Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs A Keeler’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £924 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £133.93 for that claim. The judgment does not break down any further reasoning beyond these findings and the amounts awarded.
The total of the two awards is £1,057.93. The judgment notice records that interest would be governed by the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums were not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, but no separate interest figure is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £924 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £134 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,058
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.