Case 2414154/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D McCrudden v Griffin Care Homes Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414154/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D McCrudden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Aspinall heard the matter at Liverpool on 28 January 2020. The tribunal held that Miss D McCrudden's claims for outstanding wages and holiday pay were well founded and succeeded. It also found that the respondent was not entitled to make a deduction from the claimant's pay in respect of training costs.
The written judgment corrected an arithmetical error in the oral judgment. The corrected calculation recorded £435.13 for 53 hours of HCA pay, £293.12 for 33.5 hours of senior pay, £50 for sleep-in pay for 1 to 2 August 2019, and £344.82 for holiday pay for 42 hours at £8.21, giving £1,123.07 before deduction of £437.63 already paid on 30 August 2019.
The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay £685.44 to the claimant. The separate notice on interest recorded the relevant decision day as 28 February 2020 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%, but no separate interest figure was included in the award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for outstanding wages was well founded and also held that the respondent was not entitled to deduct training costs from her pay. The written calculation records £435.13 for 53 hours of HCA pay, £293.12 for 33.5 hours of senior pay, and £50 for sleep-in pay, less £437.63 already paid on 30 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £341 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well founded and awarded £344.82 for 42 hours at £8.21. | Upheld | — | £345 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £685
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.