Case 2414201/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Emma Peers v Amanda Collins — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414201/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Emma Peers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunals on 25 October 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Phil Allen decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the merits, the tribunal found that Emma Peers was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £161.50 for that breach. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £101.99 gross for that claim.
No discrimination or other heads of loss were identified in the judgment. The total monetary award recorded by the tribunal was £263.49.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £161.50. | Upheld | — | £162 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £101.99 gross. | Upheld | — | £102 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.