Case 2414213/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Goldsmith v Three Media Associates Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414213/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Goldsmith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, found that the claimant's effective date of termination was 11 July 2021 and not 18 June 2021. On that basis, it held that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and holiday pay owed up to 11 July 2021 succeeded.
For unpaid wages, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,402.85. For holiday pay, it found that the claimant was entitled to 16 days carried over from 2020 plus 15 days for the leave year commencing on 1 January 2021, and ordered payment of £4,586.45.
The total sum payable was £7,989.30. The written judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that the respondent did not attend.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's effective date of termination was 11 July 2021, not 18 June 2021, and awarded unpaid wages owed to 11 July 2021. | Upheld | — | £3,403 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to 16 days carried over from 2020 plus 15 days for the leave year commencing 1 January 2021. | Upheld | — | £4,586 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,989
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.