Case 2414214/2021 · Employment Tribunal
appeared in person and accompanied by his mother Mrs H Clough For the v ABG Couriers Ltd (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414214/2021
- Decision date
- 3 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
appeared in person and accompanied by his mother Mrs H Clough For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. He said he did not wish to proceed with the disability discrimination complaint, and the tribunal recorded that it had never formally been accepted as a complaint to be determined, so there was no need to dismiss it on withdrawal. The tribunal found that the claimant had been summarily dismissed without entitlement to do so and that he was entitled to 9 weeks' statutory notice; it extended the EDT to 6 November 2021.
Because the claimant had not been paid between 1 August 2021 and 4 September 2021, the tribunal allowed an amendment to add an unlawful deduction from wages complaint under s.13 ERA 1996. It said this was a relabelling of the existing complaints and permitted in the interests of justice and the overriding objective given the claimant's unrepresented status. The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal complaint, but limited the compensatory element because the claimant was found unfit for work and in receipt of PIP from 17 September 2021.
The tribunal also applied a 25% uplift under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 because the respondent had not followed the ACAS disciplinary code in any real way. It upheld the notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages, and holiday pay complaints. The award totalled £15,378.45, comprising a £6,068.25 basic award, a £500 compensatory award, £2,247.50 unpaid wages, £4,045.50 notice pay, and £2,517.20 holiday pay; the recoupment section recorded a nil prescribed element and nil balance.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the dismissal was unfair. The compensatory element was limited because the claimant was found unfit for work and in receipt of PIP from 17 September 2021, and it applied a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS disciplinary process. | Upheld | — | £6,568 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment described this as failure to pay notice pay; the tribunal awarded 9 weeks' statutory notice under s.86 ERA 1996 and extended the EDT to 6 November 2021. | Upheld | — | £4,046 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal allowed an amendment to include unpaid wages for 1 August 2021 to 4 September 2021 as a relabelling of the existing claim. | Upheld | — | £2,248 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded unpaid holiday pay for 5.6 weeks' leave, none of which had been taken by the EDT. | Upheld | — | £2,517 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,378
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,068
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.