Case 2414233/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Kenworthy-Dowdall v North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414233/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Kenworthy-Dowdall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs T Kenworthy-Dowdall brought a single claim of unfair dismissal against North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust. The respondent accepted that it dismissed her and relied on conduct as the potentially fair reason. The tribunal found that the dismissal followed allegations that she had used the n-word about a black colleague on two occasions, in July 2020 and December 2020, and that the claimant had repeatedly accepted during the process that use of the word at work was unacceptable.
Employment Judge McDonald found that the respondent had a genuine belief, on reasonable grounds, that the claimant had used the word twice and that the investigation and disciplinary process were within the band of reasonable responses. The judgment rejected the claimant’s criticism that the respondent should not have relied on the July 2020 incident, should have suspended her, or had acted unfairly by proceeding with the hearing while she was on sickness absence and represented by Mr Reading. The tribunal also held that the failure earlier in the investigation to name Ms Herbert as the reporting witness did not take the investigation outside the band of reasonableness.
The tribunal concluded that the dismissal was not unfair and dismissed the claim. It therefore cancelled the remedy hearing. In the alternative, if it had found the dismissal unfair, the tribunal said it would have made a 100% Polkey reduction to the compensatory award and reduced the basic award to nil because it would have found that the claimant’s conduct contributed 100% to her dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The only claim adjudicated was unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the claim and cancelled the remedy hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- band of reasonable responses
- Polkey reduction
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
- s.122(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.