Case 2414258/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust and Mrs N Nazir — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414258/2021
- Decision date
- 22 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 21 November 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 7 September 2022 and/or that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations explaining why strike out should not happen and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims. The judgment records that the hearings fixed for 9 March 2023 and 12 to 20 February 2024 would not take place.
No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made in this judgment. The text does not identify the underlying claims by type, and it does not record any award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. It records that the claims in case numbers 2414258/2021 and 2411509/2021 were struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 7 September 2022 and/or had not actively pursued the claims, and did not make written representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 21 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.