Case 2414263/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Min Reign v 1) 202 Kitchen 2) TH Recruitment Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414263/2021
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Min Reign
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 27 January 2023 before Employment Judge Liz Ord. The claimant, Mr Min Reign, did not attend, and neither respondent attended. The judgment records only that, upon the non-attendance of the claimant, all claims in the matter were dismissed.
No substantive findings of fact or law are recorded in the extracted judgment, and no remedy was awarded. The dismissal was procedural, arising from the claimant's non-attendance, rather than from any determination of the merits of the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that, upon the non-attendance of the claimant, all claims in the matter were dismissed. The case listing identifies race discrimination as one of the claims in issue. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that, upon the non-attendance of the claimant, all claims in the matter were dismissed. The case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the claims in issue. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.