Case 2414287/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Turner v Sambro International Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414287/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McDonald
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms E Cadbury, Mr J Flynn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment does not contain substantive findings on liability. It records that the parties had agreed terms of settlement with the assistance of ACAS, and the Tribunal stayed the proceedings until 16 December 2022 so the parties could comply with those terms.
The Tribunal stated that on 17 December 2022 the Claimant’s claims would be dismissed upon withdrawal unless the Claimant wrote to the Tribunal indicating that she wished the proceedings to continue. It also noted that, if the Respondent failed to comply with the settlement terms, the Claimant needed to contact the Tribunal by 16 December 2022 because the claims would otherwise be automatically dismissed without any further order or application.
No substantive outcome, legal test, or monetary remedy is recorded in this judgment beyond the stay and the mechanism for dismissal if no further contact was received.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not adjudicate any substantive claim. It records that the parties agreed terms of settlement with ACAS assistance, the proceedings were stayed until 16 December 2022, and the claims would be dismissed upon withdrawal on 17 December 2022 unless the Claimant wrote to the Tribunal to continue the proceedings. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.