Mr J Fletcher v E-Sell Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 2414297/2021
Decision date: 24 January 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Fletcher

Respondent

E-Sell Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.

The Tribunal also noted that, on 2 November 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.

On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability or any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not specify the substantive nature of the underlying claim; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant did not apply to restore it to the Register of Companies, and because no acceptable reason was given after the Tribunal's 2 November 2022 opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.