Case 2414321/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Leah Ellison v A & M Grill House Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414321/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Leah Ellison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunals on 1 November 2021. The respondent, correctly named as A & M GRILL HOUSE LTD, failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Shotter determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing on 18 March 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Ms Leah Ellison's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay her £159.20 gross. No separate award breakdown is given in the judgment, and the attached interest notice explains the general interest regime without recording any interest sum as part of the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined on the basis of a rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £159 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £159
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.