Case 2414346/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Liam Bolland v A & M Grill House Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414346/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Liam Bolland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment. The claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunals on 3 November 2021, and the respondent, A & M GRILL HOUSE LTD, did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Shotter therefore determined that the claim could properly be decided without a contested hearing, and the hearing listed for 18 March 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Liam Bolland £331.66 gross. The judgment does not break the award down into separate components and does not record any other substantive remedy beyond that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment was issued under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £331.66 gross. | Upheld | — | £332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £332
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.