Case 2414358/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Difilippo v Italianology Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414358/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Difilippo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 2 October 2019 before Employment Judge Shotter, sitting alone, the tribunal upheld the claimant’s claims against Italianology Limited. It found an unlawful deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 in respect of unpaid wages for 27 June to 28 July 2019 and 17 days' overtime, and ordered payment of £1,733.82 net.
The tribunal also found the claimant was entitled to one week's notice and that the respondent had not paid it, so the wrongful dismissal claim succeeded and £234.30 net was ordered for unpaid notice. In addition, the tribunal found 22 days' accrued holiday had not been paid under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded £1,030.92 net, calculated at £46.86 per day for the period 27 September 2018 to the effective date of termination, 28 July 2019.
Finally, the tribunal found the respondent had not provided a written statement of terms and conditions of employment in accordance with s.1 ERA 1996 and awarded compensation of £1,000, described as four weeks' gross pay. The notice to parties stated that unpaid sums could attract interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within 14 days, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996, covering unpaid wages for 27 June to 28 July 2019 and 17 days' overtime. | Upheld | — | £1,734 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week's notice and awarded notice pay for unpaid notice. | Upheld | — | £234 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 22 days' accrued holiday remained unpaid under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,031 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had not provided a statement of terms and conditions under s.1 ERA 1996 and awarded compensation of 4 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,999
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.