Case 2414399/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Kenyon v Mereside Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414399/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Kenyon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dunlop sat alone at Manchester on 21 January 2020 and determined the case under Rule 21 after the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that Mereside Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P Kenyon's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £3,090.90.
The tribunal also found that Mereside Limited had failed to pay Mr Kenyon's expenses in breach of contract and ordered payment of £156.00. The judgment included the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days, but it did not record a separate interest amount in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,091 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £156 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,247
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.