Case 2414403/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Amanda Green and others (see Schedule) v Wholesale Realisations Ltd (In Administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414403/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Amanda Green and others (see Schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the first respondent's title to Wholesale Realisations Limited (in Administration). It made a protective award for the claimants listed in the Schedule as entitled to an award, ordering remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 20 July 2021.
The award was made for claimants who worked at the Preston Branch. The Tribunal recorded that it had heard evidence satisfying it that there were 26 redundancies at that branch. Mr Ackerley's protective award claim was rejected because he worked at the Warrington Branch and had not produced evidence of 20 or more proposed redundancies at that establishment.
Mr Ackerley's holiday pay claim was withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal. Duplicate claims presented by Mr Sahal Dadhiwala were also recorded as withdrawn and dismissed on withdrawal. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were stated to apply to the protective award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award made for the claimants listed in the Schedule who worked at the Preston Branch; the respondent was ordered to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 20 July 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Mr Ackerley's protective award claim was rejected because he worked at the Warrington Branch and had not produced evidence of 20 or more proposed redundancies at that establishment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Mr Ackerley's holiday pay claim was withdrawn by his representatives by email dated 28 September 2022 and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Duplicate claims presented by Mr Sahal Dadhiwala under case numbers 2414401/2021 and 2414402/2021 were withdrawn by his representatives by letter dated 23 November 2021 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.